- About AALHE
- Member Portal
- Support AALHE
|EMERGING DIALOGUES IN ASSESSMENT|
Going Global: Creating the Sociological Literacy Framework from International Assessment Practitioners
July 14, 2016
Susan J. Ferguson
U.S. higher education faculty and administrators would benefit greatly from investigating other countries for models of curricular standards and assessment. I learned this lesson while I was reviewing the relevant literature on sociology learning outcomes and assessment for the Measuring College Learning (MCL) Project (highered.ssrc.org). After I had fully covered the U.S. literature on teaching introduction to sociology courses and requirements for the sociology major, I turned to the European literature to see what was written about the sociology curriculum. At first it was difficult to find comprehensive guidelines for sociology. I initially found some university-specific sociology undergraduate guidelines from the University of Salamanca, Trinity University, and the University of Rome. I also found some general undergraduate benchmarks, such as the Norwegian Qualifications Framework (NQF) from Norway, but it was not specific to sociology.
Then I hit gold—some of the best curricular work in sociology at the undergraduate level is in the United Kingdom and Australia. Practitioners in the United States could learn from studying these global curricular models and emulating their strengths.
The first document I came across, the United Kingdom’s Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education’s (QAA) 2007 subject benchmark statement for sociology, is succinct at only 7.5 pages, but it is highly comprehensive. Written for the QAA by the British Sociological Association, it stipulates a guiding set of learning outcomes for the bachelor’s degree in sociology for U.K. undergraduate programs. The threshold standards are seen as descriptors of typical achievement or the minimally acceptable standard that students must achieve to qualify for an honors degree in sociology. Anyone seeking a bachelor’s degree in sociology in the U.K. should (in theory) achieve these same learning outcomes, no matter what program or school they attended.
Despite its brevity, this benchmark statement covers the basic tenets of the discipline as well as the history of sociology and how it relates to other social sciences. It describes subject-specific knowledge and skills that sociology majors should learn. It also addresses how the content of this discipline is linked to teaching, learning, and assessment. Additionally, the document includes benchmark standards for undergraduate sociology students. These benchmarks serve to assess the individual performances of students in relation to specific learning outcomes, and to provide a framework to compare sociology programs across the United Kingdom. The benchmark statements also impart to employers the content and skills covered by particular degrees. The United States should consider having similar concise disciplinary statements that are updated regularly as guidelines for undergraduate curriculum development and review.
The second document, the Australian Sociological Association’s (TASA) “Sociology: Threshold Learning Outcomes,” was published more recently in 2012, and it reflects a quality assurance effort to ensure disciplines in higher education meet specific standards. Using discipline experts from across Australia, TASA developed threshold learning outcomes, which essentially are the minimum standards and base level outcomes that any sociology major must meet before graduating. Here is another national document that holds all sociology students—and programs of study—to the same bar.
Of particular interest here is how TASA organizes the sociology threshold learning outcomes into three primary domains: knowledge and understanding; skills; and engagement. This is a much more effective approach than long lists of content for undergraduates to learn.
Both the sociology curricular documents from the United Kingdom and from Australia provide efficient guidelines and best practices for undergraduate sociology programs. Moreover, both the Australian and United Kingdom sociology learning outcomes parallel nicely the work that has been done in the United States, but their approach is more accessible and less controversial. In both cases, a government agency authorized disciplinary associations to create standards for learning excellence relevant to their fields. These benchmarks and thresholds offer general expectations and standards for the development of new programs or the revision of existing academic programs, but they are not mandated.
After reviewing the U.S. and global literature, my coauthor and I found sufficient overlap in various frameworks to enumerate a reasonable number of broad learning outcomes for the introductory sociology course and for the sociology major in the United States (Ferguson and Carbonaro 2016). We created the Sociological Literacy Framework, which describes a set of essential concepts and competencies for the sociology major. The goal (and our hope) is that this framework serves as a step in the direction of the exemplary models in the U.K. and Australia for the undergraduate study of sociology.
The framework has two broad categories that organize learning outcomes for sociology. The first category, labeled the Sociological Perspective, contains five essential concepts that are central to the discipline of sociology, started in introductory sociology courses and then explored in depth as the student proceeds through the major. In addition to having an understanding of these essential sociological concepts, students also need to develop and apply disciplinary competencies. The second category, the Sociological Toolbox, contains six essential competencies that sociology majors should master. (Table 1 in the Appendix offers a brief overview of the Sociological Literacy Framework.) Ideally, these concepts and competencies will help create consistency and accountability among programs of study, guide professors in designing their courses, ensure employers that students have met basic standards to graduate, and—most importantly—best prepare students for success in sociology.
After working on the Measuring College Learning Project, my perspective on using global resources on higher education has shifted substantially. All of us in higher education have something to gain by learning from each other across national boundaries and ultimately, doing so will help serve our students better.
Susan Ferguson is a professor of sociology at Grinnell College in Iowa, where she teaches introductory sociology courses, as well as courses on the family, media sociology, sociology of the body and social inequality and identity. Her critically acclaimed anthology, Mapping the Social Landscape: Readings in Sociology (McGraw-Hill, 2010) is used in introductory classes across the country.
Active in the American Sociological Association’s (ASA) Section on Teaching and Learning, she serves as co-chair of the ASA Task Force on Liberal Learning and the Sociology Major Updated. Recently she co-authored the chapter on sociology in Improving Quality in American Higher Education: Learning Outcomes and Assessments for the 21st Century (Jossey-Bass, 2016), based on her work with the Measuring College Learning Project, a multidisciplinary effort to define and measure learning outcomes in six disciplines.
Ferguson earned her bachelor’s and master’s degrees from Colorado State University and her Ph.D. in sociology from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Ferguson, Susan J. and William Carbonaro. 2016. “Measuring College Learning in Sociology.” Pp. 135-187 in Improving Quality in American Higher Education: Learning Outcomes and Assessments for the 21st Century. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA). 2007. Subject Benchmark Statement for Sociology. Gloucester, UK: QAA.
The Australian Sociological Association (TASA). 2012. “Sociology: Threshold Learning Outcomes.” Hawthorne, Victoria: Australian Sociological Association.
Appendix: Table of Sociological Literacy Framework